Competitive Markets: Applications
Using the competitive model to evaluate policy: why the free-market equilibrium maximises total surplus, and the deadweight loss created by price ceilings, price floors and excise taxes.
- Compute total surplus and explain why competitive equilibrium maximises it
- Compute the shortage and deadweight loss from a binding price ceiling
- Compute the surplus and deadweight loss from a binding price floor
- Compute tax incidence and deadweight loss from a per-unit excise tax
Total surplus and efficiency
- consumer surplus
- producer surplus
Use it when you need the overall measure of a market's economic benefit, to compare the free-market outcome against a policy intervention.
Throughout this lesson: , , giving equilibrium , (check: and ).
Price ceilings
A price ceiling is a legal maximum price. It only matters (binds) if set below the equilibrium price.
Price floors
A price floor is a legal minimum price. It only binds if set above equilibrium.
Excise taxes and tax incidence
A per-unit excise tax drives a wedge between the price buyers pay () and the price sellers receive ().
- price paid by buyers
- price received by sellers
- the per-unit tax
Use it when a tax is imposed and you need to find the new equilibrium quantity and the prices on each side of the market.
- the after-tax equilibrium quantity
Use it when you need the government's revenue from the tax, or the efficiency cost, once the after-tax quantity and prices are known.
Exam practice
Summary and review
- Total surplus is maximised at the competitive equilibrium.
- Binding price ceiling (below ): shortage, quantity traded falls to , deadweight loss triangle appears.
- Binding price floor (above ): surplus (unsold quantity), quantity traded falls to , deadweight loss triangle appears.
- Excise tax creates a wedge ; tax revenue ; .
- Tax incidence depends on relative elasticity, not on which side is legally taxed: the less elastic side bears more of the burden.