Steady State
İKT217 / Lecture 7
Lecture 7 · Week 9 · Besanko & Braeutigam ch. 7 · about 45 min

Costs and Cost Minimization

Economic cost versus accounting cost, and the firm's mirror image of consumer choice: choosing the cheapest combination of labour and capital to produce a target output, using the isocost line and the tangency condition.

By the end you can
  • Distinguish economic cost (explicit plus implicit) from accounting cost
  • Write the isocost line and identify its slope
  • Apply the cost-minimization tangency condition to find the optimal input mix
  • Solve for the minimum cost of producing a target output with a Cobb-Douglas production function

Economic cost versus accounting cost

Economic costDefinitionFormula sheet →
Economic cost=explicit cost+implicit cost\text{Economic cost} = \text{explicit cost} + \text{implicit cost}
explicitcostexplicit cost
actual cash payments (wages, rent, materials)
implicitcostimplicit cost
opportunity cost of resources the firm already owns

Use it when you need to compute true economic cost or economic profit, not just the accounting figure — the same distinction opened this course in Week 2.

The most common implicit cost is the opportunity cost of capital: if an owner has 1 million TL of their own money tied up in the business rather than earning a return elsewhere, that forgone return is a real economic cost, even though no invoice records it.

Your turn

A firm owner has 500,000 TL of personal savings invested in the business instead of in a bond fund paying 8% a year. What is the implicit annual cost of this capital, in TL?

The isocost line

Just as a consumer’s budget line shows affordable bundles of two goods, a firm’s isocost line shows every combination of labour and capital available for a given total expenditure.

Isocost lineKey formulaFormula sheet →
wL+rK=C⟹K=Cr−wrLwL + rK = C \quad\Longrightarrow\quad K = \frac{C}{r} - \frac{w}{r}L
ww
wage rate
rr
rental rate of capital
CC
total expenditure on inputs

Use it when you need the set of input combinations available at a given cost, or the isocost line's slope, -w/r.

Cost-minimizing input choice

A firm minimizing the cost of producing a given target output Qˉ\bar Q chooses the input bundle where the isocost line is tangent to the Qˉ\bar Q isoquant — the exact mirror image of the consumer’s tangency condition from Lesson 4.

Cost-minimization tangency conditionKey formulaFormula sheet →
MRTSLK=wr⟺MPLMPK=wr⟺MPLw=MPKrMRTS_{LK} = \frac{w}{r} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \frac{MP_L}{MP_K} = \frac{w}{r} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \frac{MP_L}{w} = \frac{MP_K}{r}
MPL/wMP_L/w
MP_K/r = output per lira spent, equalised across both inputs at the cost-minimising bundle

Use it when you are finding the cheapest way to produce a given output level, given input prices.

Worked example · Solving a cost-minimization problem0/6

Q=L0.5K0.5Q = L^{0.5}K^{0.5}. Wage w=4w = 4 TL, rental rate r=9r = 9 TL. The firm must produce Qˉ=60\bar Q = 60 units. Find the cost-minimising L and K, and the minimum cost.

Your turn

Using the tangency result K=49LK = \dfrac{4}{9}L and LK=3600LK = 3600 from the worked example, what is K∗K^*?

Check your understanding

At a firm's current input bundle, MPL=20MP_L = 20, w=5w = 5, MPK=15MP_K = 15, r=3r = 3. Is this bundle cost-minimising for its current output?

Deriving a cost function

Repeating the cost-minimization problem at every possible output level QQ traces out the firm’s total cost function C(Q)C(Q) — exactly analogous to tracing a demand curve by repeating consumer choice at every price.

Your turn

Using the same Q=L0.5K0.5Q = L^{0.5}K^{0.5}, w=4w=4, r=9r=9 setup, find the minimum cost of producing Qˉ=30\bar Q = 30 instead of 60. (Hint: with K=49LK = \frac{4}{9}L, the constraint becomes 49L2=900\frac{4}{9}L^2 = 900.)

Exam practice

Exam question 1

A firm's own building, if rented out, would earn 15,000 TL a month, but the firm uses it instead. What is the monthly implicit cost of using the building?

Exam question 2

Input prices change so that labour becomes relatively more expensive (w rises, r unchanged). What happens to a cost-minimising firm's input mix, for a fixed output target?

Exam question 3

Q=L0.5K0.5Q = L^{0.5}K^{0.5}, w=2w = 2, r=8r = 8. Target output Qˉ=40\bar Q = 40. Using K/L=w/r=2/8=0.25K/L = w/r = 2/8 = 0.25 and LK=1600LK = 1600, find L∗L^*.

Exam question 4

Which best describes why the cost-minimization tangency condition mirrors the consumer's utility-maximisation tangency condition?

Summary and review

Review deck · 8 cards0/8 mastered